New study out of Rutgers showing that mayoral control does not necessarily lead to improvements and often cuts out parent and community voices.
Governance and Urban School
Improvement: Lessons for New Jersey
From Nine Cities
http://ielp.rutgers.edu/docs/MC%20Final.pdf
Excerpts:
New York a group comprised of multiple advocacy groups within the city, the Parent Commission on School Governance and Mayoral Control, convened in June 2008 to make recommendations over whether to extend mayoral control upon its sunset in June 2009 and weighed in on a variety of issues, including increasing community involvement in decisions affecting neighborhood schools.525 While aspects of their recommendations were adopted in new legislation, the level of parent and community involvement so far has not increased to their desired level…., among the many recommendations to the New York legislature of the Parent Commission on School Governance and Mayoral Control, were recommendations to grant specific powers to the Community District Education Schools in the process over closing and opening schools and opening new charter schools.
…In Chicago, where Mayor Daley has touted his “Renaissance 2010” plan to close 100
poorly performing schools and replace them with new schools by 2010, parent activists,
including Parents United for Responsible Education, sponsored legislation that would
create an independent panel to design a new process for school closings.528 PURE
identified eight major problems with Renaissance 2010: 1) decisions are driven by real
estate development priorities; 2) students are displaced, which increases detrimental
mobility; 3) violence has increased in and around affected schools; 4) board members do
not attend hearings, yet vote unanimously for all recommendations; 5) teachers are not
being fairly evaluated; highly qualified, certified teachers are being displaced and the
percentage of African-American teachers is declining; 6) the newly-created schools do
not have Local School Councils, the subject of a current lawsuit; 7) new schools get an
unfair share of resources; and 8) the new schools and charter schools are not performing
better than other schools.
The most recent report evaluating strong mayoral involvement in
New York City raises serious questions about the claims of the Bloomberg
administration—and others—that the mayor’s leadership has resulted in significant
achievement gains in the New York City Public Schools. Although supporters of
strong mayoral involvement in New York City may argue that the authors of this report
have been consistent critics of mayoral control, the authors comprise a range of political
perspectives. For example, Diane Ravitch and Sol Stern originally had supported
mayoral control; sociologists Aaron Pallas and Jennifer Jennings have been analyzing
New York City achievement data for a number of years and generally have argued that
the Department of Education data often disguise problems in student achievement; and
Deborah Meier, one of the early progressive small school pioneers in New York City and
the founder of Central Park East Secondary School, has long been a critic of the negative
effects of standardized testing on teaching and learning. In August 2010, New York State
Commissioner of Education increased the cut scores for the 2010 state achievement tests
in response to charges that the low cut scores for proficiency gave an inaccurate portrait
of student abilities. These changes resulted in a significant reduction in proficiency rates
across the state, including New York City, casting doubt on the validity of the dramatic
increases claimed by the mayor and chancellor; and most importantly in the reemergence
of the race based achievement gap in New York City.309
Leonie Haimson
Executive Director
Class Size Matters
124 Waverly Pl.
New York, NY 10011
212-674-7320
classsizematters@gmail.com